Merkle plans to return the total $180M raised to buyers, framing the transfer as accountable capital administration.
Farcaster co-founder Dan Romero mentioned on January 22 that the decentralized social protocol shouldn’t be shutting down, pushing again towards on-line claims that adopted its acquisition by Neynar earlier this week.
He additionally mentioned Merkle, Farcaster’s father or mother entity, plans to return the total $180 million it raised to buyers.
The feedback got here after days of heated debate on X, the place critics framed the Neynar deal as a quiet wind-down, whereas supporters argued it was an orderly transition that retains the protocol alive and returns capital.
What Farcaster’s Founders and Backers Are Saying
Romero said Farcaster recorded about 250,000 month-to-month energetic customers in December final yr and greater than 100,000 funded wallets, including that the protocol “works and can proceed to work.”
He added that Neynar, a venture-backed startup that has constructed core infrastructure for Farcaster since its early days, plans to shift the community in a extra developer-focused route.
Romero announced the acquisition on January 21, noting that possession of the protocol contracts, code repositories, the Farcaster app, and Clanker would transfer to Neynar over the approaching weeks.
This transition follows a big strategic pivot in December 2025, when Farcaster introduced it was ditching its social graph to embrace a wallet-driven progress mannequin, making in-app pockets performance the core product.
You may additionally like:
On investor returns, Romero mentioned Merkle would give again the total $180 million raised over 5 years, describing the transfer as a part of an effort to be accountable with capital. He additionally addressed private criticism straight, saying he purchased his home utilizing proceeds from Coinbase’s IPO, not Farcaster funds.
A number of buyers backed that account. Antonio García Martínez, an early consumer and investor in each Farcaster and Neynar, called shutdown claims “full bullshit” and defended Farcaster’s unique purpose of constructing a permissionless social community the place customers management their knowledge. Balaji Srinivasan additionally confirmed that cash was being returned to buyers, including that Romero was already financially impartial earlier than founding Farcaster.
Critics Query Management, Governance, and Outcomes
Different customers had been unconvinced. Some questioned how an organization that raised $150 million in a 2024 spherical led by Paradigm may promote to a agency that raised far much less. Builder LogicCrafterDz argued that Farcaster’s issues got here from management and restricted neighborhood enter, saying Neynar’s takeover solely works if governance and incentives turn into extra open.
Extra aggressive criticism got here from accounts accusing Romero of cashing out whereas progress stalled. Linda Xie, an early Coinbase colleague and Farcaster investor, rejected these claims, saying they contained “many inaccuracies” and that she would work with Romero once more. Different builders and customers pointed to the issue of constructing social networks at scale, citing the struggles of platforms like Threads and Mastodon.
For now, the controversy displays a cut up crypto viewers. Some see the handover and investor refunds as a uncommon, orderly consequence, whereas others view it as a expensive experiment that fell wanting expectations.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in unique BingX Trade rewards (restricted time supply).
