In a narrowly divided party-line vote, The U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee advanced its model of crypto market laws in a 12-11 vote Thursday, marking a milestone in congressional efforts to lastly legislate complete crypto market construction guidelines.
All Democrats on the committee opposed the movement, citing substantive disagreements over ethics provisions, shopper protections, and the independence of the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC).
Chairman Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) opened the markup by touting months of negotiations and “substantive, cordial conversations,” however acknowledged that “elementary coverage disagreements” stay.
“Now it’s time to maneuver this course of ahead,” Boozman said, emphasizing the necessity to flesh out a regulatory regime for digital commodity intermediaries — together with exchanges, brokers, sellers, and custodians — beneath the CFTC’s oversight.
This dialogue emerged from the Agriculture Committee’s up to date legislative textual content released on January 21, which builds on a bipartisan dialogue draft issued in November and on the Home-passed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act of 2025.
The laws goals to lastly settle long-standing questions on how digital belongings must be regulated within the U.S. by giving the CFTC unique jurisdiction over spot markets for “digital commodities,” whereas leaving securities-related digital belongings beneath the Securities and Trade Fee.
Bipartisan crypto aspirations clearly undercut committee discussions
Whereas preliminary variations of the Agriculture Committee’s language have been launched collectively by Boozman and Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Thursday’s markup confirmed some fractures alongside social gathering strains.
Booker reminded colleagues that the bipartisan November draft represented “one among my higher experiences within the Senate,” however argued that Republicans deserted the bipartisan course of after the Christmas recess.
“To be clear, the product earlier than us at present isn’t the bipartisan draft that we have been engaged on,” Booker said.
Rating Member Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) indicated that Democrats help “the progress that has been made,” however confused that key points stay unresolved — significantly ethics safeguards for public officers and stronger shopper protections.
Failed Democrat amendments
A number of Democrat-led amendments failed on the committee ground. An ethics-focused modification that will have barred the President, Vice President, federal elected officers, and sure members of the family from profiting off crypto whereas in workplace — and required lined belongings to be positioned in blind trusts — was defeated.
Different Democratic proposals addressing crypto ATM fraud protections, chapter protections for crypto intermediaries, and expanded shopper safeguards additionally didn’t cross.
Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) echoed considerations about ethics, urging language that covers all federal officers.
Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) charged that Republican opposition can be louder if related provisions focused previous Democratic administrations, alluding to reported financial gains by the Trump household from crypto belongings whereas in workplace.
Regardless of all of the discussions, the assembly led to a vote roughly an hour after deliberations came about.
Senator Cynthia Lummis celebrated the deliberation outcomes, posting on X, “Nice to see digital asset market construction cross [the Senate Agriculture Committee.] We’re one step nearer to getting this laws to [the President’s] desk, and I stay up for persevering with to work intently with my colleagues throughout the aisle to make America the digital asset capital of the world.”
What comes subsequent?
What comes subsequent is an extended and procedurally heavy highway. The invoice should be formally reported, positioned on the Senate calendar, after which undergo management scheduling choices, potential filibusters, ground amendments, and a 60-vote cloture hurdle earlier than it might probably cross the Senate with a easy majority.
The Senate Banking Committee can be working by laws which incorporates controversial issues like stablecoin yield and tokenization.
Progress there was slowed by delays in markup and efforts to achieve a compromise satisfying numerous pursuits, together with Wall Avenue lobbyists.
Even with progress within the Senate Committee, it will nonetheless should be reconciled with the Home’s broader CLARITY Act (which the Home advanced in July final yr) almost definitely by a convention committee, earlier than a remaining up-or-down vote in each chambers sends it to the president’s desk.
In the meantime, the White Home planned another meeting next week to align crypto, banking, Republican, Democratic, and administration positions, amid President Trump and his workforce pushing again on key provisions that will prohibit officers from personally benefiting from crypto.
