Coinbase-backed Layer-2 community Base is below hearth from the crypto neighborhood after selling a so-called “Content material Coin” that misplaced practically all its worth shortly after launch.
The controversy started on April 16 when Base shared a tokenized model of its “Base is for Everybody” put up on Zora, a decentralized content-sharing platform, via its official X account.
This attracted swift and widespread consideration to the token regardless of a disclaimer on Zora clearly stating the coin wasn’t linked to Coinbase or Base and warned consumers to not anticipate returns.
However, many crypto traders interpreted the promotion on X as an official endorsement.
As a result of this, the token’s market cap rapidly soared to round $17 million. Nevertheless, the thrill was short-lived as a result of the coin’s worth plummeted roughly 95%, erasing greater than $15 million of its market cap.
Blockchain analytics agency Lookonchain flagged suspicious buying and selling habits, revealing that three wallets purchased massive quantities of the token earlier than Base’s announcement and later offered for a mixed revenue of round $666,000.
Including to the controversy, Abhi, the founding father of crypto advertising agency Apcollective, noted that the highest three wallets managed 47% of the provision.
He added:
“[The] chart clearly reveals traditional pump-and-dump, large inexperienced candles adopted by instantaneous sell-off.”
Base defends “Contentcoin” idea
Following the backlash, Base attempted to make clear its intentions whereas explaining that the transfer was a part of an experimental push to deliver content material on-chain.
In line with the agency:
“To be clear, Base won’t ever promote these tokens, and these will not be official community tokens for Base, Coinbase, or some other associated product. The content material we share is artistic, and we’re going to maintain bringing tradition onchain.”
Jesse Pollak, the Ethereum layer-2 lead developer, stated that the token was by no means supposed to operate as a typical memecoin or funding car.
As an alternative, the token was born on the concept of a “Content material Coin,” which was to tokenize artistic works.
In line with him:
“[Content Coin] represents a single piece of content material and it’s created in a context the place the expectation is about that the coin is the content material and the content material is the coin — no extra, no much less.”
He emphasised that this mannequin permits creators to monetize viral posts via buying and selling charges and shared possession, shifting the main target away from hypothesis.
Pollak added:
“If you happen to attempt to apply a conventional meme or challenge coin valuation mannequin to content material cash, you’re going to be upset.”
Regardless of the reason, critics throughout the crypto area stay unconvinced.
Alon, co-founder of Pump.fun, mentioned that any challenge with affect ought to act responsibly. He emphasised that protocols should keep away from setting unrealistic expectations, particularly involving tokens.
He stated:
“I’m an enormous advocate for the imaginative and prescient of “tokenizing all the things” however you possibly can’t change present market realities – in case you launch a coin AND have social affect, that comes with duty.”
