Billionaire Invoice Miller IV says proof‑of‑stake blockchains resembling Ethereum and Solana are unlikely to “win on the finish of the day,” arguing that Bitcoin’s proof‑of‑work design confers a sturdiness different networks can’t match.
In a July 28 interview with CNBC’s “Closing Bell,” the billionaire investor stated current US coverage strikes could give proof‑of‑stake property a brief‑time period enhance, however not a long-lasting edge over Bitcoin.
Miller assessed how market construction proposals outline decentralization:
“If you happen to take a look at the best way the laws [the CLARITY Act] was written, it permits applied sciences like Ethereum and Solana blockchains to be labeled as ‘decentralized,’ when they’re really not.”
He added that if these chains launched at this time, “they’d undergo a a lot completely different course of.”
His core objection is governance, describing proof of stake as whoever has an enormous stake within the blockchain will get to “say what occurs.”
In Miller’s view, “that’s precisely how society works at this time, it’s not likely a technological revolution.” Against this, he referred to as Bitcoin’s proof‑of‑work consensus “a recreation‑altering expertise,” arguing that the vitality price tied to creating new bitcoin underpins community integrity relatively than entrenching massive token holders.
Regulatory-driven rally
Miller linked current market positive aspects in Ethereum to Washington’s coverage calendar, pointing to the signing of the GENIUS Act and the advance of the CLARITY Act.
President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into regulation on July 18, creating the primary federal framework for greenback‑backed stablecoins.
The Home cleared it on July 17 after bundling it procedurally with CLARITY and an Anti‑CBDC measure the prior day. The Senate then accredited the consolidated model earlier than the invoice went to the White Home.
Whereas CLARITY moved as a part of that package deal to hurry flooring motion, the enrollable textual content that finally turned regulation was the GENIUS stablecoin framework.
Miller’s level is that coverage momentum can raise property primarily based on proof of stake, however he doubts it alters the lengthy‑run race with Bitcoin. He added:
“Folks want to begin pondering what issues these varied blockchains resolve. And the reply is: most of them really don’t resolve any actual issues aside from Bitcoin.”
Fixing accountability
He framed Bitcoin as an answer to financial accountability, mentioning its clear and immutable ledger as a option to audit “who owns what” and the place funds are flowing.
Different chains, in his view, don’t resolve an extra drawback that Bitcoin hasn’t already addressed, they usually lack its liquidity and first‑mover momentum.
That thesis extends to company stability sheets:
“It’s my take that in 20 or 30 years, each firm can be a Bitcoin treasury firm.”
Moreover, the billionaire predicted that bond managers shopping for “Bitcoin‑regulated bonds” and fairness managers including Bitcoin‑linked exposures will outperform friends who don’t.
Miller concluded that it “stays to be seen” whether or not proof-of-stake expertise can ship a long-lasting benefit.
